Drowning in recruiting chaos again?
If you’re exploring Lever, chances are you’re tired of juggling dozens of tools just to track candidates, communicate, and pull reports your hiring managers actually care about.
But let’s be real—the biggest pain is wasting hours chasing updates and missing top talent because your process is messy or scattered across spreadsheets.
Lever aims to fix this with its combined ATS and CRM suite, designed to centralize the entire candidate journey, automate tedious tasks, and give you detailed insights—without the usual clunky user experience.
In this review, I’ll break down how Lever helps you simplify the hiring process from start to finish so your team can finally focus on the candidates, not the admin.
Here’s what you’ll find in this Lever review: a deep dive into its key features, pricing structure, ease of use, and how it stacks up against top competitors—everything to support your buying decision.
You’ll walk away with the insights and trust you need to pick the features you need to hit your hiring targets confidently.
Let’s dig in.
Quick Summary
- Lever is a Talent Relationship Management platform that combines ATS and CRM to streamline hiring and engage candidates effectively.
- Best for mid-sized to large companies needing unified recruitment and proactive candidate nurturing.
- You’ll appreciate its strong automation, integrated analytics, and extensive HR system integrations that save time and improve decisions.
- Lever offers customized pricing based on company size and features, with no free trial and consultation required for quotes.
Lever Overview
Lever’s been around since 2012, with primary teams in San Francisco and Toronto. They built their platform from the ground up to natively combine applicant tracking with relationship management.
I find they serve a remarkably broad audience, from scaling startups to global enterprises like Netflix. What truly defines their market position is the focus on holistic talent relationships, moving beyond just tracking active applicants for one open role.
Their 2022 acquisition by Employ Inc. was a significant strategic move, giving them more resources for innovation. This context is critical for any modern Lever review you read.
Unlike competitors such as Greenhouse that can feel very rigid, Lever is designed around workflow fluidity. I believe their key advantage is the natively integrated CRM and ATS functionality, making proactive sourcing feel much more intuitive.
You’ll see them working with top tech companies and recognizable enterprises like Atlassian and KPMG, but they also have a strong, loyal base of scaling mid-market businesses.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing strategic company functions, understanding event booking software is equally important for many businesses.
From my analysis, their entire strategy is about shifting recruitment from a reactive administrative task to a proactive, strategic company function. They are focused on helping you build and nurture your talent pipeline long-term.
Now, let’s dig into their features.
Lever Features
Talent acquisition chaos slowing your growth?
Lever features are actually designed to streamline your entire recruitment journey from start to finish. These are the five core Lever features that transform how you attract, engage, and hire top talent.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing simplifying tech decisions, my article on best K-12 software covers solutions for educational districts.
1. Applicant Tracking System (ATS)
Drowning in a sea of resumes?
Manually sifting through applications consumes valuable time and leads to missed talent. This administrative burden often delays your critical hiring process.
Lever’s ATS centralizes candidate data, streamlining everything from application to offer. From my testing, its resume parsing automatically extracts key information, making screening incredibly efficient. This feature tracks candidate progress through customizable stages.
This means you can quickly identify the best candidates, reducing time-to-hire and administrative overload for your recruiting team.
2. Candidate Relationship Management (CRM)
Missing out on great passive candidates?
Building relationships with potential future hires is tough, especially when they aren’t actively applying. Your talent pipeline can quickly run dry.
Lever’s natively built CRM helps you nurture a deep talent pipeline with personalized outreach. What I love is how it enables proactive relationship-building with passive candidates, ensuring no potential hire is overlooked. You can tag, filter, and search your entire database.
So you can consistently engage with top talent, building a robust pool of candidates for future roles, even before they’re officially open.
3. Talent Analytics & Visual Insights
Hiring decisions based on guesswork?
Without clear data, it’s impossible to know what’s truly working in your recruitment strategy. You can’t optimize what you don’t effectively measure.
Lever provides robust analytics and “Visual Insights” dashboards for data-driven decisions. This is where Lever shines: role-based dashboards track critical KPIs like time-to-hire and source effectiveness. This feature helps you identify bottlenecks and measure ROI.
This means you get actionable insights to optimize your recruitment strategy, making smarter, more informed hiring decisions that impact your bottom line.
4. Automation Capabilities
Interview scheduling eating up your day?
Manual scheduling and repetitive communications waste valuable hours for your recruiting team. This often slows down the entire hiring process and introduces unnecessary errors.
LeverTRM offers powerful automation to speed up time-to-hire and cut administrative burdens. For instance, it automates interview scheduling with calendar integrations like Google Calendar, eliminating manual entry. This feature supports fully customized workflows.
The result is your team spends less time on tedious tasks and more time engaging candidates, leading to a faster and more efficient hiring cycle.
5. Integration Ecosystem
Can’t connect your HR tools?
A fragmented tech stack often means data silos and manual data entry between your essential HR systems. This leads to inefficiency and potential compliance risks.
Lever boasts an extensive integration ecosystem with over 300 connections. From my testing, its seamless integration with major HCM systems like Workday is particularly impressive, automating onboarding. This feature ensures data flows freely across your enterprise.
So you can integrate Lever into your existing tech stack, automate cross-platform processes, and ensure a smooth, cohesive HR operation without data gaps.
Pros & Cons
- ✅ Intuitive design and user-friendly interface makes it easy to learn.
- ✅ Integrated ATS and CRM provides comprehensive candidate management.
- ✅ Robust analytics and visual insights for data-driven hiring decisions.
- ⚠️ High fees for API access can increase integration costs for custom setups.
- ⚠️ May lack extensive native onboarding functionality, requiring more integrations.
- ⚠️ Mentions of service turnover might impact support quality for some users.
You’ll appreciate how these Lever features work together to create a cohesive talent acquisition suite. This unified approach streamlines your entire hiring process, fostering better team collaboration and efficiency across your team.
Lever Pricing
Unsure about recruitment software costs?
Lever pricing is custom-quoted based on your organization’s size and specific feature needs. This approach means you won’t find public tiers, but it ensures your Lever pricing aligns directly with your hiring scale.
Cost Breakdown
- Base Platform: Custom quote, starting around $3,500/year (market data)
- User Licenses: Approximately $6-8 PEPM (per employee per month)
- Implementation: Varies by professional services needed for setup
- Integrations: Varies, some API access or complex connections may incur fees
- Key Factors: Employee count, chosen feature bundles (TRM/Enterprise), add-ons
1. Pricing Model & Cost Factors
Understanding Lever’s custom pricing.
Lever’s pricing model is entirely subscription-based, tailored to your employee count and the specific features or “bundles” you choose. From my cost analysis, you’ll find that your organization’s size largely dictates the base cost, with higher employee counts leading to increased annual fees. Add-ons like Advanced Analytics or Candidate Texting will also factor into your total.
This means your budget needs to account for both your current scale and any advanced capabilities you require.
2. Value Assessment & ROI
Is this investment worthwhile?
Lever combines ATS and CRM, which can significantly streamline your hiring process and talent nurturing, offering strong ROI. What I found regarding pricing is that investing in Lever can prevent costly hiring delays and manual recruitment efforts. While not publicly listed, the estimated costs suggest a mid-market focus, competing by offering a comprehensive suite rather than just basic tools.
Budget-wise, this approach helps you justify the expense by demonstrating clear improvements in recruitment efficiency.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: If you’re also exploring various digital tools, my article on best DJ software covers essential insights for creative work.
3. Budget Planning & Implementation
Planning your total spend.
Beyond the annual subscription, consider the total cost of ownership. From my cost analysis, you’ll need to factor in professional services for implementation, data migration, and training. While Lever’s pricing scales flexibly, some users report significant renewal price increases, so negotiation is key for long-term budget stability.
So for your business, planning for these initial setup costs and potential renewal adjustments is crucial for accurate budgeting.
My Take: Lever’s custom pricing offers flexibility, making it suitable for growing SMBs to large enterprises that need tailored talent acquisition solutions, but requires direct sales engagement.
The overall Lever pricing reflects value customized to your specific recruitment needs.
Lever Reviews
What do real Lever users truly say?
I’ve dived deep into numerous Lever reviews, analyzing feedback from diverse users to provide an unbiased look. Here’s what actual customers think about their experience with the platform.
1. Overall User Satisfaction
Users are largely satisfied here.
Lever generally earns high marks, averaging 4+ stars on major review platforms like G2 and Capterra. From my review analysis, its intuitive design consistently delights users, making candidate tracking remarkably straightforward. What I observed is a strong overall positive sentiment, with most customers appreciating its simplicity and how it effectively streamlines their hiring processes.
This broad satisfaction stems from its ease of use and ability to significantly reduce administrative burdens.
2. Common Praise Points
Intuitive design is a consistent win.
Users repeatedly praise Lever’s intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies candidate tracking and processing. From the reviews I analyzed, the integrated ATS & CRM functionality is highly valued, combining comprehensive candidate management with engagement. Its robust reporting, especially Visual Insights, also receives significant praise for data-driven insights.
These features mean you can expect a streamlined, data-driven, and collaborative hiring experience.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing collaborative hiring experience, my article on safeguard your team’s wellbeing is equally important.
3. Frequent Complaints
Some common frustrations emerge.
While generally positive, some Lever reviews point to specific areas for improvement. What stood out in customer feedback is the concern around high fees for API access, limiting custom integrations. Users also occasionally mention lacking extensive native onboarding functionality, potentially requiring further integrations for a complete solution.
These issues seem more like additional considerations for your tech stack rather than fundamental deal-breakers.
What Customers Say
- Positive: “Lever is super intuitive to use. Its simple terminology makes candidate tracking straightforward and simple.” (G2 Review)
- Constructive: “Lever charges high fees for API access, which can increase the cost of integrations for companies with custom setups.” (Capterra User)
- Bottom Line: “Lever helps cut administrative burdens, streamlines hiring, and makes the process a smooth, efficient experience.” (TrustRadius Comment)
Overall, Lever reviews paint a picture of a powerful, user-friendly ATS/CRM solution delivering significant value for talent teams. My analysis shows credible user experiences highlighting its strengths and minor areas for growth.
Best Lever Alternatives
Choosing the right talent acquisition platform isn’t easy.
The best Lever alternatives offer distinct strengths. From my competitive analysis, I found each excels for different business sizes, budgets, and hiring priorities, helping you choose wisely.
1. Greenhouse
Need highly structured, compliant hiring workflows?
Greenhouse excels when you prioritize very detailed processes and robust compliance. What I found comparing options is that Greenhouse offers more rigid, configurable ATS workflows for complex, multi-stage hiring. This alternative provides deeper reporting for accountability.
Choose Greenhouse for highly structured, customizable ATS workflows prioritizing compliance and detailed, multi-stage hiring processes.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing different business operations, you might find my analysis of auto repair software helpful for streamlining shop management.
2. Workable
Small to mid-sized business seeking simplicity?
Workable is known for user-friendliness and comprehensive job board integrations, simplifying job posting. Alternative-wise, I found it offers easy job board integrations and AI candidate screening, appealing to smaller businesses with simpler hiring needs.
Choose Workable for your smaller business if you prioritize ease of use, direct job board integrations, and a lower entry price point.
3. SmartRecruiters
Prioritize team collaboration and mobile hiring?
SmartRecruiters focuses on highly collaborative and mobile-optimized hiring experiences. From my competitive analysis, this alternative provides extensive collaboration features for hiring teams, appealing to organizations valuing a broad marketplace of integrated partner ecosystem for niche functions.
Choose SmartRecruiters if your organization prioritizes a mobile-optimized hiring experience, strong team collaboration, and a vast, readily integrated partner ecosystem.
Quick Decision Guide
- Choose Lever: For a holistic TRM approach, strong CRM, and advanced analytics.
- Choose Greenhouse: For highly structured ATS workflows and detailed compliance reporting.
- Choose Workable: For user-friendly, budget-conscious hiring for small to mid-sized businesses.
- Choose SmartRecruiters: For highly collaborative, mobile-optimized hiring with extensive integrations.
The best Lever alternatives empower you to tailor your choice to specific operational needs. Ultimately, the right decision depends on your unique business requirements and growth strategy for talent acquisition.
Setup & Implementation
Concerned about complicated software setup and training?
This Lever review provides practical insights into what it takes to successfully deploy and adopt this talent acquisition software, helping you set realistic expectations for your implementation.
1. Setup Complexity & Timeline
Setting up Lever isn’t entirely ‘set it and forget it’.
Lever’s custom workflows mean your initial setup varies depending on your organization’s hiring process complexity and desired customizations. From my implementation analysis, tailored integrations often add significant complexity. What I found about deployment is that smaller businesses might be operational in a few weeks, while larger or more complex setups could take 1-3 months, especially with Professional Services.
You’ll want to map out your desired hiring workflows and identify necessary integrations upfront to streamline your process.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing talent acquisition, understanding how to boost your leads and engage audiences is equally important.
2. Technical Requirements & Integration
Integration is where the rubber meets the road.
Lever is a cloud-based solution, so your primary technical focus will be on integrating it with existing HRIS, communication, and e-signature tools. What I found about deployment is that Lever boasts over 300 integration options, but complex custom setups or API access can incur additional costs and require dedicated IT involvement.
Your IT team should review current systems for compatibility and plan for data migration and API needs if custom integrations are critical.
3. Training & Change Management
User adoption is key to your ROI.
Lever’s intuitive design aims for easy user adoption, with resources like their “Fast Track” course and Administrator series supporting quick onboarding. From my analysis, the user-friendly interface simplifies training significantly, allowing your team to quickly master candidate tracking and communication without extensive effort.
You’ll want to leverage Lever’s provided training and designate internal champions to ensure smooth adoption across all talent acquisition teams.
4. Support & Success Factors
Who supports you after go-live?
Lever offers tiered support, from basic Lever Care to enhanced Preferred/Premium options with dedicated Customer Success Managers. Implementation-wise, support quality varies, with some post-acquisition turnover noted. However, the platform’s intuitive design and robust features often mitigate day-to-day support reliance for simpler issues.
Consider your desired support level and internal team’s technical expertise when choosing a plan, ensuring you have resources for ongoing optimization and troubleshooting.
Implementation Checklist
- Timeline: Weeks to 3 months depending on customization
- Team Size: Dedicated HR/TA lead, IT support, hiring managers
- Budget: Professional services for tailored integrations and training
- Technical: Review HRIS, communication, e-signature integrations
- Success Factor: Clear workflow mapping and strong internal project lead
The overall Lever implementation offers a balanced approach, making it accessible for varied business sizes. Achieving success hinges on clear upfront planning and leveraging integrations.
Who’s Lever For
Lever: Is it right for your hiring team?
This Lever review analyzes who benefits most from its comprehensive talent acquisition suite. I’ll help you quickly determine if your business profile, team size, and use cases align perfectly with Lever’s strengths.
1. Ideal User Profile
For comprehensive talent acquisition needs.
Lever is ideal if your team, like HR professionals, recruiters, and talent leaders, seeks a unified ATS and CRM solution. From my user analysis, you’ll find it best for managing end-to-end recruitment, from sourcing to strategic decision-making. You’ll appreciate its comprehensive TRM capabilities.
You’ll thrive if you prioritize building strong candidate relationships and desire data-driven insights to optimize your hiring strategy.
2. Business Size & Scale
Scales from SMBs to large enterprises.
Lever caters effectively to a wide range, from growing SMBs enhancing processes to larger enterprises with high-volume hiring and global scaling needs. What I found about target users is that it adapts to varied recruitment volumes and complexities across diverse industries like tech and healthcare.
Assess if your business requires a robust, adaptable system capable of supporting significant growth in hiring operations.
3. Use Case Scenarios
Unified ATS, CRM, and advanced analytics.
This software excels in scenarios demanding automated workflows for efficiency, strong candidate engagement, and actionable data insights for strategic hiring. From my analysis, it streamlines inconsistent candidate experiences, making processes seamless and personalized through features like self-scheduling.
Your use case aligns if you need to eliminate manual tasks, build talent pipelines, and improve DEI initiatives with powerful tools.
4. Who Should Look Elsewhere
When Lever might not fit.
If your business needs a very basic, low-cost ATS for occasional hiring without extensive CRM or advanced analytics, Lever might be overkill. User-wise, you’ll find simpler, more affordable alternatives like JazzHR better suited for minimal recruitment needs or highly specialized niche solutions.
Consider a lighter, less feature-rich ATS if your focus is strictly on simple job posting and applicant tracking for few hires.
Best Fit Assessment
- Perfect For: Organizations needing unified ATS/CRM for end-to-end hiring
- Business Size: SMBs to large enterprises with high-volume or scaling needs
- Primary Use Case: Comprehensive candidate management, strategic talent acquisition
- Budget Range: Mid-to-high investment for a full-suite TRM
- Skip If: Basic, low-volume hiring; need only simple, low-cost ATS
Ultimately, this Lever review shows its strength lies in serving organizations that prioritize a unified, data-driven approach to talent acquisition. Evaluate your strategic hiring needs carefully for the best fit.
Bottom Line
Lever delivers on its talent acquisition promise.
My Lever review provides a comprehensive analysis, revealing why this integrated ATS/CRM platform stands out. This section offers my final assessment and clear recommendations for your business.
1. Overall Strengths
Lever excels in talent acquisition fundamentals.
Lever’s intuitive design and seamless ATS/CRM integration make candidate management straightforward, praised for ease of use. Automation for scheduling and tracking significantly boosts efficiency, while robust Visual Insights enable data-driven decisions. From my comprehensive analysis, the intuitive ATS/CRM streamlines daily workflows for better candidate experiences.
These strengths directly translate into reduced administrative burden, faster time-to-hire, and improved hiring quality for your team’s overall productivity and success.
- 🎯 Bonus Resource: While we’re discussing optimizing your team’s overall productivity, understanding how to cut network latency is equally important.
2. Key Limitations
Understand Lever’s primary considerations.
While powerful, Lever has areas for improvement. Some users report high fees for API access, impacting integration costs for custom setups. Native onboarding functionality may also be limited, necessitating additional tools. Based on this review, support turnover post-acquisition concerns some users regarding ongoing service quality.
These limitations are important considerations, but for many businesses, they represent manageable trade-offs rather than outright deal-breakers.
3. Final Recommendation
My clear recommendation for Lever.
You should choose Lever if your priority is an intuitive, integrated ATS/CRM solution for efficient candidate management and data-driven insights. It suits SMBs and mid-market companies seeking streamlined hiring processes. From my analysis, it excels for growing teams focused on candidate experience.
Evaluate its API pricing for your specific integration needs and consider a demo to see how its robust features align with your unique talent acquisition workflow.
Bottom Line
- Verdict: Recommended for streamlined talent acquisition
- Best For: SMBs to mid-market companies prioritizing integrated ATS/CRM
- Biggest Strength: Intuitive, integrated ATS & CRM with strong automation
- Main Concern: High API costs and some support turnover
- Next Step: Request a demo to assess integration fit
This Lever review confirms confidence in this assessment remains high for its target audience. Evaluate it against your specific needs to make an informed decision for your talent acquisition strategy.