Disperse Review: Deliver 28x ROI on Your Construction Progress Tracking

Still using paper checklists to track progress?

If you’re managing large construction projects, you already know how painful it is to manually monitor site progress and catch mistakes before they spiral.

What I hear most is that things slip through the cracks every week, causing expensive rework or delays that throw your timeline out the window.

Disperse tackles these headaches by combining 360° site scanning, AI-powered issue detection, and direct BIM model comparisons into one intuitive platform—freeing you from tedious admin work and surfacing problems right when they start.

In this review, I’ll show you how Disperse helps you stay ahead of costly errors with objective insights you can’t get from spreadsheets or walkthroughs.

You’ll find a detailed Disperse review covering its core features, real-world workflows, pricing info, and the top alternatives so you can compare with confidence.

You’ll walk away knowing the features you need to finally streamline construction tracking and make smarter decisions.

Let’s dive into the analysis.

Disperse Overview

Disperse has been tackling construction productivity since 2015, operating out of London. Their entire mission is to streamline complex on-site operations by applying AI to visual progress tracking.

What really sets them apart is their focus on large, complex construction projects for mid-market and enterprise clients. You’ll find them a strong fit for commercial or residential builds where getting objective progress data is essential.

Their recent $16 million funding round was a smart move, signaling a clear commitment to product innovation and US expansion, a key point I’ll evaluate through this Disperse review.

Unlike all-in-one platforms like Procore that do a bit of everything, Disperse goes deep on proactive, AI-driven issue detection. I find this focus delivers far more granular insights for preventing rework than a general field module could.

They work with general contractors and developers you’d recognize on major builds across the UK and US, having been deployed on over 100 large-scale projects already.

From my analysis, their strategy centers on turning visual site captures into predictive analytics that actually stop problems before they start. This directly addresses your need to move beyond simple documentation toward actionable intelligence.

Let’s dig into their core features.

Disperse Features

Project progress tracking feeling like a constant guessing game?

Disperse features offer an AI-powered platform to give you granular, objective insights into your construction projects. Here are the five main Disperse features that provide critical clarity and foresight.

1. Full Coverage 360° Site Scanning

Tired of inaccurate or incomplete site progress reports?

Reliance on manual walk-throughs means you often miss critical details or get subjective updates, leading to blind spots and potential issues.

Disperse deploys experts with 360° cameras for regular site scans, creating a complete visual record that feeds directly into the AI platform. From my testing, the intuitive building overview and side-by-side comparisons of different dates truly shine. This feature provides a detailed visual timeline of your project’s evolution.

This means you can visually track every change on-site, ensuring a comprehensive and objective view of progress.

2. Work-in-Place Tracking & Issue Detection

Is finding project issues too late a recurring problem for your team?

Discovering incomplete tasks or deviations from plans when they’re already costly to fix can derail schedules and budgets.

The platform’s AI-human hybrid system analyzes visuals against plans, flagging issues like incomplete work or potential conflicts early on. This is where Disperse’s “Spotlights” get it right by prioritizing critical problems that could lead to expensive rework. I found it quite effective in highlighting potential clashes before they become major headaches.

This helps you address issues proactively, saving significant time and money by preventing costly rework and delays.

3. BIM Compare

Struggling to align design models with on-site reality?

Manually comparing BIM models with actual site progress is time-consuming and often leads to discrepancies going unnoticed.

Disperse seamlessly integrates with 3D BIM models, aligning them with weekly site photos from the same vantage points. What I love about this approach is how easy it is to spot progress or delays between design and reality without any manual effort. You can also toggle model layers by phase for specific insights.

So you can instantly visualize how your design plans are translating on-site, ensuring everything aligns perfectly.

4. Advanced Reporting

Are your project reports lacking objective, actionable data?

Generating accurate progress reports manually can be a huge time sink and often lacks the objective data needed for informed decisions.

Disperse automatically generates detailed progress reports, highlighting “Planned vs. Work-in-Place” against native schedule files. Here’s the thing – this feature helps integrate actual progress directly into your existing schedules, eliminating guesswork. It gives you a clear understanding of pace across trades.

This means you get objective, data-driven insights that empower you to identify bottlenecks and make smarter decisions quickly.

5. Impulse Product

Do building elevations and performance insights feel disconnected from issues?

It’s tough to get a comprehensive view of performance issues directly tied to building elevations, leading to scattered problem-solving.

Impulse integrates performance insights into interactive building elevations, presenting issues to project managers in a coherent way. From my experience, its ability to filter by trade or task activity on an elevation view is incredibly powerful. This solution coordinates drawings, BIMs, and schedules for comprehensive insights.

What you get instead is a unified view of issues tied directly to building components, simplifying tracking and decision-making.

These Disperse features work together to create a powerful digital twin of your construction project, providing unparalleled oversight and helping you make smarter, data-backed decisions.

Disperse Pricing

Struggling to pin down construction tech costs?

Disperse pricing operates on a custom quote model, meaning you’ll need to contact sales to get a tailored proposal that truly fits your project’s unique requirements.

1. Pricing Model & Cost Factors

Their custom pricing makes sense.

Disperse’s pricing structure is not a one-size-fits-all, but rather a custom-tailored quote that aligns with your specific construction project. What I found regarding pricing is that it depends heavily on project scope – including type, size, schedule, and the specific modules like 360° scanning or BIM Compare that your business needs.

This means your budget gets a precise estimate, avoiding unnecessary costs for features your project doesn’t require.

2. Value Assessment & ROI

Does this justify the cost?

Disperse focuses on delivering a strong ROI by reducing errors and administrative tasks, directly impacting your bottom line. Budget-wise, their AI-powered insights save costly rework and delays, which often exceed initial software investment for large, complex projects. You’re investing in operational efficiency and predictive problem-solving, not just software.

This translates into improved project margins and a more predictable budget outcome for your construction projects.

3. Budget Planning & Implementation

Consider total cost of ownership.

When planning your budget, remember Disperse’s offering includes their personnel for site scanning, reducing your internal labor burden. From my cost analysis, the modular approach allows flexible scaling if your needs evolve, like adding progress tracking retroactively, which is a smart financial safety net.

So for your project, you can expect a comprehensive solution where implementation costs are integrated into the custom quote.

My Take: Disperse pricing is geared towards enterprise and mid-market construction firms, offering a highly customized, value-driven solution for complex projects where bespoke tracking and insights are critical.

The overall Disperse pricing reflects tailored value for complex construction project needs.

Disperse Reviews

What do customers really think?

In this section, I’ll dive into actual Disperse reviews to provide balanced insights into real user experiences and help you understand what customers truly think.

1. Overall User Satisfaction

Users find it genuinely impactful.

From my review analysis, Disperse reviews generally show a strong positive sentiment, particularly for its ability to deliver objective, data-driven insights. What I found in user feedback is how its unique AI-powered approach truly sets it apart for progress tracking and issue detection on large construction projects.

This indicates you can expect a significant uplift in project visibility and efficiency.

2. Common Praise Points

The insights are a game-changer.

Users consistently praise Disperse for providing unparalleled visibility into project progress and its early problem detection capabilities. From customer feedback, the objective, visual data transforms decision-making and significantly reduces the need for manual data collection by project managers.

This means you’ll gain clearer project oversight and save valuable team time.

3. Frequent Complaints

Adoption can be a hurdle.

While highly effective, Disperse reviews reveal some common challenges, primarily surrounding user adoption and data management. What stands out in user feedback is how resistance to new technology from traditional team members can complicate initial implementation and impact workflow integration.

These issues often depend on your team’s readiness for digital transformation and training.

The overall Disperse reviews highlight strong practical benefits balanced with implementation considerations for users.

Best Disperse Alternatives

Too many options for construction tech?

The best Disperse alternatives include several strong options, each better suited for different business situations, project scales, and specific construction technology priorities.

1. Procore

Need an all-in-one construction management platform?

Procore excels if your business needs an integrated, end-to-end platform covering project management, financials, and safety, not just specialized progress tracking. From my competitive analysis, Procore offers a broader suite for lifecycle management, though it’s a larger, more comprehensive investment than Disperse.

Choose Procore if you require an extensive, integrated solution for managing your entire construction project.

2. Autodesk Construction Cloud

Heavily invested in design and BIM workflows?

ACC is a better choice if your organization is deeply embedded in Autodesk’s ecosystem and requires robust BIM integration across all project phases. What I found comparing options is that ACC connects design and construction workflows seamlessly, a key advantage if BIM is central to your operations.

Consider this alternative when extensive BIM integration and a wide suite of design-to-build tools are critical for your needs.

3. OpenSpace

Seeking straightforward 360° visual documentation?

OpenSpace might be preferred for its potentially simpler capture workflow and strong visual documentation capabilities, especially if your primary need is a direct 360° photo-based progress record. From my analysis, OpenSpace offers ease of use for visual site capture, providing comprehensive visual records with minimal complexity.

Choose OpenSpace for a simpler, effective 360° reality capture solution focused on clear visual progress records.

4. Buildots

Prioritizing highly accurate, data-driven progress verification?

Buildots could be your choice for its strong emphasis on objective, data-driven progress measurement, directly comparing reality to BIM models and schedules. Alternative-wise, Buildots excels in quantifiable, data-driven progress metrics, focusing on direct verification from site to plan.

Consider this competitor if data accuracy and precise, quantifiable progress measurement are your top priorities.

The best Disperse alternatives depend on your specific business needs and project complexity, more than just general features.

Disperse Setup

Concerned about the effort involved in a new system?

This Disperse review delves into the practicalities of deployment and adoption, helping you understand the real-world Disperse setup requirements before committing.

1. Setup Complexity & Timeline

Is Disperse a quick installation?

Disperse implementation is a structured, customized process aligning with your project’s unique specifications and existing drawings. From my implementation analysis, success hinges on a collaborative approach and detailed project-specific setup, requiring more than a plug-and-play expectation.

You’ll need to allocate time for initial setup and ongoing alignment with project plans, ensuring a reliable as-built record.

2. Technical Requirements & Integration

Expect some clear technical prerequisites.

Disperse is cloud-based and integrates with 2D drawings, BIM models, and scheduling tools like Primavera P6. What I found about deployment is that you’ll need a stable internet connection for continuous data upload and access, alongside digital plans for optimal use.

Plan for robust internet infrastructure and a clear data management strategy to handle the significant data generated.

3. Training & Change Management

Prepare for the human element of adoption.

A hybrid AI-human approach means there’s a learning curve for your project teams to fully leverage insights and new workflows. From my analysis, effective change management is crucial for user acceptance, especially for those accustomed to traditional methods, requiring more than just basic training.

Invest in thorough training and clear communication to mitigate resistance and ensure your team comfortably maximizes the platform’s benefits.

4. Support & Success Factors

How much support will you actually get?

Disperse offers a “value-first” approach, with a large team of architects and engineers acting as a remote site inspection team. What I found about deployment is that this embedded human expertise provides high-level support, ensuring reliable insights and proactive issue identification throughout your project.

Focus on aligning project goals with Disperse’s capabilities and actively engaging their expert team to maximize the platform’s impact.

Overall, a successful Disperse setup demands active participation and a willingness to adapt to new, data-driven workflows for maximizing project efficiency.

Bottom Line

Is Disperse the right choice for your construction projects?

My Disperse review provides a comprehensive look at an AI-driven progress tracking platform that offers immense value for specific construction contexts and operational needs.

1. Who This Works Best For

Large, complex construction projects demand this solution.

Disperse is ideal for general contractors, owners, and developers managing large-scale, complex projects where objective progress tracking and early issue detection are critical. What I found about target users is that teams struggling with transparency and manual tracking will find immense value in Disperse’s automated insights.

You’ll see significant improvements if your projects face delays and cost overruns due to insufficient site data and communication gaps.

2. Overall Strengths

Unparalleled visual progress tracking and issue detection.

The software excels in transforming 360° site scans into actionable data, identifying potential problems early with “Spotlights,” and integrating with BIM. From my comprehensive analysis, its hybrid AI-human approach ensures high data accuracy and reliable insights for proactive decision-making that reduces project risk.

These strengths allow your project teams to shift focus from data collection to critical management tasks, enhancing overall productivity and control.

3. Key Limitations

Custom pricing and change management are considerations.

While powerful, Disperse’s custom pricing means you must engage directly for investment details, and implementation requires commitment to change management. Based on this review, some team members may resist adopting new digital tools, especially those accustomed to traditional, manual progress tracking methods.

I’d say these limitations are less about functionality and more about the organizational commitment needed for successful adoption and maximum ROI.

4. Final Recommendation

Disperse is highly recommended for its niche.

You should choose Disperse if your priority is highly accurate, automated, and visual progress tracking with proactive issue detection on large, complex projects. From my analysis, this solution is best for improving transparency and efficiency rather than serving as an all-encompassing construction management suite.

My confidence level is high for organizations needing specialized progress tracking, but consider alternatives if you need broader management features.

This Disperse review demonstrates strong value for specific construction contexts, empowering you with objective control and improved productivity for your critical projects.