Mastt Review: Gain 10x Efficiency in Project Reporting with AI

Still relying on scattered spreadsheets and outdated reports?

If you’re trying to manage complex capital projects or infrastructure portfolios, you know how hard it is to get real-time financial and risk data in one place.

In my analysis of Mastt, I noticed that disconnected reporting wastes hours and drives mistakes throughout your project delivery workflow.

Mastt tackles this by centralizing financials, risk, and reporting—giving you a live, top-down view across all projects and programs. What I discovered is Mastt automates the reporting grind and pulls every contract, risk, and budget update into a single dashboard, so you’re always up to date. That’s a major upgrade from chasing spreadsheets.

In this review, I’ll show you how Mastt actually fixes these portfolio headaches in your daily work, from setup through reporting.

In this Mastt review, I’ll break down their core features, pricing tiers, my own research findings, and real alternatives you should compare.

You’ll get the features you need to make an informed call, save hours each month, and avoid common reporting pitfalls.

Let’s dive into the analysis.

Mastt Overview

Mastt is a Sydney-based company I’ve researched, founded in 2019. Their core mission is to replace disconnected spreadsheets and legacy systems for managing capital projects.

From my evaluation, they specifically target infrastructure asset owners, government agencies, and large consulting firms. What stands out is their focus on top-down portfolio and program management, not just granular, single-project tasks.

Their recent $9.5M funding and a strategic investment from the CEFC show strong confidence. This Mastt review confirms this capital is fueling significant product expansion for users like you.

Unlike broad platforms like Procore, Mastt isn’t for field management. My analysis shows they offer a more focused and intuitive solution for owner-side financial controls, which I find really simplifies executive reporting.

I found they primarily serve government agencies and major infrastructure asset owners. You’ll see their platform used by organizations needing real-time, consolidated visibility across entire project portfolios.

What impressed me is how their business strategy centers on providing a single source of truth for portfolio financials. This directly addresses your need to move from manual reporting toward automated dashboards for better executive oversight.

Now let’s examine their core capabilities.

Mastt Features

Capital project management feels like spreadsheet chaos.

Mastt offers integrated solutions designed to bring order to your capital works and infrastructure projects. These Mastt solutions create a centralized, real-time platform. Here are the five core Mastt solutions that transform portfolio management.

1. Portfolio & Program Management

Struggling to see your entire project portfolio clearly?

Manually compiled reports for your project overview are instantly outdated. This creates frustrating reliance on old data, delaying critical decisions for your team.

Mastt aggregates key data (financials, milestones, risks) from all projects into a centralized dashboard. You can easily drill down from portfolio to program. What I love is how this solution offers a comprehensive visual overview of health, budget, and schedule across dozens of projects.

You gain real-time, accurate project overview. This empowers your team to make faster, better decisions across your capital works portfolio.

2. Project Controls (Financials)

Worried about budget blowouts on capital projects?

Managing capital project financials with spreadsheets often leads to budget blowouts and messy records. You need a system for auditable financial control.

Mastt’s Project Controls solution allows setting up budgets, logging contracts, and tracking variations/payments in real-time. Here’s what I found: forecast cost to complete updates automatically, giving managers immediate insight. This feature links directly to contract administration.

You prevent budget surprises and gain immediate financial health insights. This ensures auditable records and far better cost control for your projects.

3. Contract Administration

Drowning in contractor payment paperwork?

Managing contractor payments, claims, and compliance is a cumbersome process. This often leads to administrative overhead and frustrating payment delays.

Mastt’s feature streamlines this. You can log payment claims from contractors directly within the system. The solution tracks claims against contract value, manages approval workflows, and generates payment schedules. This feature creates a clear, auditable trail of all transactions and communications.

This means less administrative burden and fewer payment disputes. You get a clear, auditable trail, ensuring smoother contract execution.

4. Reporting & Dashboards

Manual reports eating up your valuable time?

Creating monthly project status reports for stakeholders and executives is painfully manual and time-consuming. You need faster, more accurate insights.

Mastt automates this by pulling real-time data from other modules into pre-built, standardized templates. A project manager can generate comprehensive reports in minutes. From my evaluation, this feature alone significantly reduces reporting time. Dashboards are configurable, providing live portfolio visualizations.

You save countless hours on reporting, freeing your team for more strategic work. This ensures stakeholders always have up-to-date, professional insights.

5. Risk & Issues Management

Are critical risks hiding in static spreadsheets?

Risk management often remains a static, rarely updated spreadsheet process. This means potential threats aren’t proactively addressed, jeopardizing project success.

Mastt moves risk management into a dynamic process. You can log risks and issues, assign owners, set mitigation strategies, and track status. The system links risks to their potential cost and schedule impact, helping you prioritize the most critical threats. This data rolls up to the portfolio level.

You gain a proactive risk management approach. This ensures critical threats are prioritized, minimizing their impact and improving overall project success.

What I found is that these Mastt solutions work together to provide a truly integrated portfolio management platform, eliminating data silos. This cohesive approach ensures your data is always current, providing clear insights across all projects.

Mastt Pricing

Mastt pricing is surprisingly clear.

Mastt pricing offers transparent, tiered plans, a refreshing approach in the capital works software space. This structure simplifies your budgeting process by providing clear per-user costs upfront, setting the stage for predictable investment.

Plan	Price & Features
Standard	AUD $100 per user/month (billed annually) • Core project controls • Contract administration • Risk management • Standard reporting
Business	AUD $150 per user/month (billed annually) • Everything in Standard • Portfolio & Program Management dashboards • Cash flow forecasting • Custom branding
Enterprise	Custom pricing – Contact Us • Everything in Business • API and SSO access • Custom report templates • Dedicated onboarding support • Enhanced security features (e.g., audit logs)

1. Value Assessment

Clear value for your investment.

From my cost analysis, Mastt’s transparent tiered pricing immediately shows its value, especially with the Business tier delivering comprehensive portfolio management. This tier gives you essential executive insights without forcing you into bespoke enterprise features. What I found regarding their pricing approach is how it scales naturally with your organization’s evolving needs.

This means your budget gets a predictable, efficient investment for managing complex capital projects, ensuring core functionality without hidden charges or surprises.

2. Trial/Demo Options

Try before you commit.

Mastt offers a generous 14-day free trial of their Business plan, letting you fully test portfolio management features. What I found valuable is the ability to thoroughly explore this key tier before making any financial commitment. Personalized demos are also readily available, helping you understand the platform’s full capabilities directly tailored to your specific needs.

This ensures you can validate ROI and user adoption, reducing risk and helping your team feel confident before committing to the full pricing.

3. Plan Comparison

Choose your ideal Mastt plan.

The Standard plan suits individual project managers, but the Business tier is where Mastt’s core value truly shines with its portfolio dashboards. What I found useful is how this tier specifically targets organizations needing high-level insights. The Enterprise tier then adds critical features like API access for large organizations with complex integration needs.

This strategic tiered pricing helps you match Mastt’s capabilities to your actual operational scale, ensuring your budget aligns with specific requirements.

My Take: Mastt’s pricing is transparent and strategically tiered, making it an excellent fit for mid-market to enterprise organizations seeking clear budget predictability for robust capital works and infrastructure portfolio management.

Overall, Mastt pricing offers a clear, predictable investment for your capital works management needs. It reflects significant value for a comprehensive solution, helping you budget confidently for essential portfolio oversight.

Mastt Reviews

What do real customers truly think?

To give you an honest perspective, I’ve analyzed numerous Mastt reviews from platforms like G2 and Capterra. This section dives into real user experiences to help you understand the software’s true impact.

1. Overall User Satisfaction

Users are generally very satisfied.

From my review analysis, Mastt consistently achieves high ratings, averaging around 4.7 out of 5 stars across major platforms. What stands out is how users clearly value its specialized focus on capital works, finding it far superior to generic tools. My review of the feedback confirms this strong sentiment.

This indicates you can expect a purpose-built solution that highly satisfies its target audience for portfolio management.

2. Common Praise Points

Its single source of truth truly shines.

Users consistently praise Mastt for being a ‘single source of truth,’ consolidating all project financials and data. What I found in user feedback is how this eliminates spreadsheet chaos and manual errors, creating reliable, real-time insights for decision-makers. These Mastt reviews emphasize efficiency.

This means you gain clear, consolidated views, drastically improving reporting and financial oversight across your projects.

3. Frequent Complaints

Initial setup has a learning curve.

While the interface is clean, frequent complaints highlight a moderate initial learning curve, especially with financial controls setup. What stands out from user reviews is how committing to the process is crucial for getting full value from the platform. My analysis shows this isn’t a deal-breaker for most users, who eventually grasp it.

These are often initial hurdles, suggesting effective onboarding and dedicated effort will minimize potential frustration.

Overall, Mastt reviews showcase a powerful, specialized tool with highly satisfied core users, despite some initial setup challenges. It’s truly built for complex capital works.

Best Mastt Alternatives

Navigating capital project software choices?

The best Mastt alternatives include several strong contenders, each tailored for different project scales, organizational structures, and specific management priorities you might have.

1. Procore

Need field-to-office construction management?

Procore is an all-encompassing construction management platform ideal if your primary user is a General Contractor. From my competitive analysis, Procore offers comprehensive job site and back office tools for a wide range of project needs, extending far beyond Mastt’s focused financial controls. It’s a robust alternative.

Choose Procore when you need a single system managing everything from field operations to complex project management.

2. Oracle Aconex

Mega-project document control your priority?

Aconex is an enterprise-grade solution built for complex, multi-billion dollar projects where document control and legal auditability are paramount. What I found comparing options is that Aconex ensures absolute auditability and robust document workflows, making it suitable for projects with stringent compliance needs. This alternative targets the highest tier.

Select Aconex for top-tier projects demanding unmatched document control and stringent legal compliance, despite higher costs.

3. InEight

Require granular, bottom-up project controls?

InEight provides a deep suite of project controls focused on advanced work packaging, estimating, and detailed scheduling. Alternative-wise, InEight provides deep, bottom-up project controls capabilities for precise earned value management, appealing to dedicated project controls specialists. This level of detail surpasses Mastt’s executive overview.

Choose InEight if your organization needs intricate project controls and detailed integration with planning tools.

4. e-Builder Enterprise

Seeking end-to-end capital project management?

e-Builder targets facility owners with a broad suite covering the entire capital project lifecycle, from planning through execution. From my competitive analysis, e-builder offers broad capital project lifecycle management, including bidding and planning workflows. While comprehensive, Mastt typically provides more modern financial reporting.

Opt for e-Builder when you need an integrated system managing the full spectrum of capital project processes.

The best Mastt alternatives depend on your specific project scale, existing ecosystem, and your core project management priorities more than just features. Compare wisely.

Setup & Implementation

Considering Mastt’s deployment?

Navigating a Mastt review, you’ll find implementation is crucial. This section breaks down the deployment process, helping you set realistic expectations for integrating Mastt into your business operations.

1. Setup Complexity & Timeline

Is Mastt deployment a quick win?

User feedback suggests Mastt’s initial setup requires careful planning for your portfolio structure and data migration. From my implementation analysis, success hinges on having clean source data, especially when moving financial information from spreadsheets. This critical phase dictates your overall timeline.

You’ll need to prepare meticulously for data cleansing and dedicate resources to accurately define your initial portfolio framework.

2. Technical Requirements & Integration

Technical setup: What infrastructure do you need?

As a cloud-based SaaS, Mastt has minimal technical requirements: just a modern web browser and stable internet. What I found about deployment is that API integration requires developer resources on the Enterprise plan, which is crucial for connecting with your existing accounting or PM tools.

Ensure your IT team is ready to support API development if you plan on automating data flows with other business systems.

3. Training & Change Management

How steep is the Mastt learning curve?

The learning curve for Mastt is moderate; users must grasp project controls concepts to fully leverage the platform. Implementation-wise, formal onboarding is key for adoption success, particularly if your team isn’t accustomed to centralized financial management.

Invest in training beyond the basic knowledge base, ensuring your team understands how Mastt transforms their financial workflows.

4. Support & Success Factors

Will Mastt support your deployment?

Mastt’s customer support is consistently praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful throughout the implementation process. From my analysis, their dedicated team is a significant asset, providing direct access to Australian-based experts when you encounter challenges.

Beyond vendor support, success demands internal commitment and a dedicated project manager to navigate the entire deployment journey.

Overall, Mastt implementation requires strategic planning and committed internal resources to truly transform your capital works management. It’s a journey, not a quick install.

Who’s Mastt For

Does Mastt fit your specific business needs?

This Mastt review delves into who benefits most from this specialized platform. I’ll guide you through ideal business profiles, team sizes, and specific use cases to help you quickly assess its suitability.

1. Ideal User Profile

Capital project owners seeking financial control.

Mastt is perfectly suited for government agencies, infrastructure asset owners, and large engineering and project management consulting firms. From my user analysis, organizations grappling with unmanageable spreadsheets for capital programs will find its centralized financial control invaluable. It’s built for those needing real-time visibility across portfolios.

You’ll see strong ROI if your core problem is a lack of centralized financial visibility and accurate, real-time reporting across multiple capital projects.

2. Business Size & Scale

Mid-market to enterprise scale operations.

Mastt targets mid-market to enterprise organizations overseeing large, complex capital works and infrastructure portfolios. What I found about target users is that it excels for significant investment programs, where manual tracking becomes impossible and delays costly. It’s not designed for small businesses managing single, simple projects.

Your business is a good fit if you’re outgrowing basic tools and require robust financial controls for multiple large, complex projects.

3. Use Case Scenarios

Centralized financial and risk control.

Mastt primarily excels as a single source of truth for portfolio-level financial management, risk tracking, and robust reporting. User-wise, it saves countless hours on monthly reporting cycles, transforming disparate data into actionable insights for Program Directors. It effectively replaces disconnected spreadsheets and legacy systems.

You’ll align well if your priority is real-time forecast final costs, unified financial data, and streamlined, accurate project reporting across portfolios.

4. Who Should Look Elsewhere

Not for general project management.

If you need a general-purpose project management tool for task tracking, team collaboration, or simple project scheduling, Mastt isn’t your primary solution. From my user analysis, it falls short for basic operational PM needs not centered on capital expenditure financial oversight. Its initial learning curve can be moderate for new users.

Consider broader PM software like Asana or Jira if your focus is daily task management, team collaboration, and less on large-scale capital financials.

Overall, who should use Mastt depends on your need for robust capital project financial control, not general PM. This Mastt review guides you to assess if its specialized capabilities meet your organization’s unique requirements.

Bottom Line

Mastt delivers powerful project financial control.

My Mastt review distills the platform’s core value proposition and key considerations. This section provides my final assessment to guide your decision-making process with confidence.

1. Overall Strengths

Mastt’s core value proposition shines.

Mastt truly excels by providing a single source of truth for project financials, eradicating disconnected spreadsheets and delivering powerful, real-time reporting capabilities. Its clean, modern interface simplifies complex financial tracking, making it highly intuitive compared to legacy systems. This centralized data eliminates chaos and improves accuracy across portfolios.

These strengths directly translate into significant time savings for project managers and enable faster, more accurate strategic decision-making for stakeholders.

2. Key Limitations

Every powerful tool has its nuances.

While the interface is clean, some users experience a moderate initial learning curve, particularly when mastering its financial controls and initial setup processes. Additionally, a few reviews note dashboard performance can lag with very large datasets, and there’s a desire for more out-of-the-box accounting integrations.

These limitations aren’t deal-breakers for its target audience but do require a commitment to proper setup and a clear understanding of its integration roadmap.

3. Final Recommendation

My final verdict on Mastt.

I recommend Mastt for mid-market and enterprise organizations, particularly government agencies or infrastructure asset owners, managing complex capital works portfolios. It’s ideal for those seeking to replace fragmented systems with a centralized, real-time financial management platform. It delivers high ROI through efficient reporting and oversight.

Your success will hinge on committing to the initial setup process, but the long-term gains in efficiency and control are substantial.

This Mastt review offers a clear assessment, providing strong confidence in its targeted value for large-scale capital projects.